COVID 19 and the risk of gastro-intestinal perforation: A case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: COVID19 is a viral disease with pneumonia as its most common presentation. Many presentations and complications have been reported, but gastro-intestinal perforation has not received much attention. METHODS: three cases from our hospital are presented, and the current literature was reviewed. RESULTS, CASES: All three patients were admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure due to COVID19 pneumonia and intubated. Our first patient was treated with steroids, and subsequently diagnosed with rectal perforation on day 34 of his hospital admission. The second patient was treated with steroids and tocilizumab, and diagnosed with colonic perforation 1 day after neostigmine administration, on day 14 of his hospital admission. Our third patient was treated with steroids and tocilizumab, and diagnosed colonic perforation 4 days after neostigmine administration, on day 14 of his hospital admission. RESULTS, LITERATURE: 25 more cases were found in current literature, both upper GI and lower GI perforations, either as a presenting symptom or during the course of hospitalization. These were often associated with treatment with steroids, interleukin 6 inhibitors, or both. CONCLUSIONS: Gastro-intestinal perforation is a rare but dangerous complication of COVID19. Treatment with tocilizumab and steroids may both increase the risk of this complication, and hamper diagnosis.

Intestinal perforation associated with chlorine dioxide ingestion: an adult chronic consumer during COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most devastating worldwide crises in recent years. During this pandemic, people have been exposed to products that have not been proven to be safe and effective against COVID-19. We present an adult chronic consumer of chlorine dioxide, in which a fatal outcome is described. This case demonstrates that for people searching products to protect themselves from COVID-19, unregulated access to industrial disinfectants represents a dangerous alternative. To date, there is no scientific evidence to uphold the use of chlorine dioxide or chlorine derivatives as preventive or therapeutic agents against COVID-19. Researchers and general population must take into consideration the fatal possible consequences of not following communications and warnings from health authorities and government institutions.